Review



cd4 depletion  (Bio X Cell)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio X Cell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio X Cell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 97

    Structured Review

    Bio X Cell cd4 depletion
    Cd4 Depletion, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 714 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pm41826412-65-11-25?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 714 article reviews
    cd4 depletion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    97/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    97
    Bio X Cell cd4 depletion
    Cd4 Depletion, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pm41826412-65-11-25?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 depletion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Bio X Cell cd4 depletion antibody
    Cd4 Depletion Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/us12514919-390-14-27?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 depletion antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Bio X Cell cd8 t cell depletion
    (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and <t>CD8</t> + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.
    Cd8 T Cell Depletion, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pmc12666865-89-4-15?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd8 t cell depletion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Bio X Cell antibodies anti-cd4 (gk1.5) for in vivo use, depletion
    (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and <t>CD8</t> + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.
    Antibodies Anti Cd4 (Gk1.5) For In Vivo Use, Depletion, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pmc10140615__mmc4-153-39-40?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies anti-cd4 (gk1.5) for in vivo use, depletion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Bio X Cell depleting anti-cd4 mab
    (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and <t>CD8</t> + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.
    Depleting Anti Cd4 Mab, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pmc11181119__pnas__2403054121__sapp-15-7-18?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    depleting anti-cd4 mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Bio X Cell anti-cd4 depleting antibody gk1.5
    (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and <t>CD8</t> + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.
    Anti Cd4 Depleting Antibody Gk1.5, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pmc12260523-162-11-15?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-cd4 depleting antibody gk1.5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell cd4 depleting antibody bioxcell
    A) Daily mice bodyweights measured from 0DPI to 5DPI. B) Lung viral titers expressed as plaque forming units per mL (PFU/mL) measured in lung homogenates at 5DPI. Limit of detection = 40 PFU/mL. C) Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (containing NC99 HA)-binding total IgG measured at 5DPI represented as Area under the curve (AUC) of the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) minus the background noise (OD650). Lung cell subpopulations at 5DPI are presented in panels D to H. D) Percentage of lung total T-cells (CD3+, gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + ). E) Percentage of T-cell subpopulations represented as the mean % of CD3% cells per group: <t>CD4</t> + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - ), CD8 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 - CD8 + ), T regs (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - >FoxP3 + ). CD3 + cells not included in any of the three subpopulations are categorized as “unassigned”. Statistical analysis: for comparisons among groups at several time points: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Color of the significance markers indicates the comparison they represent; for comparisons among groups at a specific time point: Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Significance is represented as:*p = 0.05 to 0.01, **p = 0.01 to 0.001, ***p = 0.001 to 0.0001, ***p < 0.0001.
    Cd4 Depleting Antibody Bioxcell, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/bio_rxiv__2025__06__23__659362-513-14-17?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd4 depleting antibody bioxcell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Bio X Cell mouse cd4 depleting antibody anti-cd4
    A) Daily mice bodyweights measured from 0DPI to 5DPI. B) Lung viral titers expressed as plaque forming units per mL (PFU/mL) measured in lung homogenates at 5DPI. Limit of detection = 40 PFU/mL. C) Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (containing NC99 HA)-binding total IgG measured at 5DPI represented as Area under the curve (AUC) of the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) minus the background noise (OD650). Lung cell subpopulations at 5DPI are presented in panels D to H. D) Percentage of lung total T-cells (CD3+, gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + ). E) Percentage of T-cell subpopulations represented as the mean % of CD3% cells per group: <t>CD4</t> + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - ), CD8 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 - CD8 + ), T regs (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - >FoxP3 + ). CD3 + cells not included in any of the three subpopulations are categorized as “unassigned”. Statistical analysis: for comparisons among groups at several time points: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Color of the significance markers indicates the comparison they represent; for comparisons among groups at a specific time point: Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Significance is represented as:*p = 0.05 to 0.01, **p = 0.01 to 0.001, ***p = 0.001 to 0.0001, ***p < 0.0001.
    Mouse Cd4 Depleting Antibody Anti Cd4, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+cd4+depleting+antibody/pm40513578-307-1-6?v=Bio+X+Cell
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cd4 depleting antibody anti-cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.

    Journal: Cancer immunology research

    Article Title: RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibition drives antitumor immunity in preclinical models of NRAS -mutant melanoma

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-25-0744

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Flow cytometry analysis of melanoma antigen panel for MHC-I, MHC-II and PD-L1 in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tumor cells were normalized to SOX10 + cells, n=3/group. (B) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and quantification of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. H-score was used to access MHC-I expression and the percentage of positive cells for PD-L1. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 + CD4 + T cells (Tregs) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. Tregs were normalized to the total number of CD4 + cells. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD8, CD69 and PD-1 expression in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. n=3/group. H-score was used to access CD8 and CD69 expressions and the percentage of positive cells for PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of exhaustion markers (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in control, responder, and treatment escape groups. T cells were normalized to the total number of live cells. Scale bar = 200 μm (G) Multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) staining of control, responder, and treatment escape tumors for DAPI, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, Ly6G, Ly6C, CD34 and SOX10 expression (H) Scoring of the multiplex IF images of the whole slides. (I) Degrees of clustering of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells versus M-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C + Ly6G − ) and PMN-MDSCs (CD11b + Ly6C − Ly6G + ) of control, responder, and treatment escape groups, n=3/group. Cells were normalized by the number of total cells. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant; C: control (not treated cells); R: responder; TE: treatment escape.

    Article Snippet: For CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell depletion, specific antibodies (anti-CD4, clone YTS191; cat. #BE0003–1; BioXCell, RRID:AB_1107636 and anti-CD8a, clone YTS169.4, cat. #BE0117, BioXCell, RRID:AB_10950145) were used.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Control, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing, Staining, Software, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence

    (A-B) Tumor growth and survival curves following pre-treatment with IgG control (n=5) or anti-CD4 + anti-CD8a +/− RMC-7977 (all n=15). Vehicle or RMC-7977 treatment was initiated when tumors reached around 100mm 3 . For T cell depletion, mice were treated 3 days before the injection of the tumor with the Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P.) and then every 4 days thereafter. The T cell depleted mice were treated with Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P., every 4 days), Anti-CD4 + Anti-CD8a + RMC-7977 was treated with Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P., every 4 days) and RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.); and RMC-7977 group was treated with only RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.) for 7 weeks. Plots correspond to each individual mouse. Dotted lines indicate when treatment started and stopped.

    Journal: Cancer immunology research

    Article Title: RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibition drives antitumor immunity in preclinical models of NRAS -mutant melanoma

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-25-0744

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-B) Tumor growth and survival curves following pre-treatment with IgG control (n=5) or anti-CD4 + anti-CD8a +/− RMC-7977 (all n=15). Vehicle or RMC-7977 treatment was initiated when tumors reached around 100mm 3 . For T cell depletion, mice were treated 3 days before the injection of the tumor with the Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P.) and then every 4 days thereafter. The T cell depleted mice were treated with Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P., every 4 days), Anti-CD4 + Anti-CD8a + RMC-7977 was treated with Anti-CD4 and Anti-CD8a antibodies (1µg/µL, I.P., every 4 days) and RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.); and RMC-7977 group was treated with only RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.) for 7 weeks. Plots correspond to each individual mouse. Dotted lines indicate when treatment started and stopped.

    Article Snippet: For CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell depletion, specific antibodies (anti-CD4, clone YTS191; cat. #BE0003–1; BioXCell, RRID:AB_1107636 and anti-CD8a, clone YTS169.4, cat. #BE0117, BioXCell, RRID:AB_10950145) were used.

    Techniques: Control, Injection

    (A-B) The effects of IgG control, anti-PD-1, RMC-7977 or anti-PD-1+RMC-7977 on the growth of OSUMMER.13 tumors. Treatment was initiated when tumors reached around 100mm 3 . The IgG group was treated with IgG control (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=5), the vehicle group was treated with vehicle (P.O., q.d.: n=5), the vehicle + IgG group was treated with IgG control (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=5) and vehicle (P.O., q.d.: n=5), total of n=15M for controls, the anti-PD-1 group was treated with Anti-PD-1 (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=7), the RMC-7977 group was treated with RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.: n=7), and the RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 group (n=7) was treated with a combination of RMC-7977 and Anti-PD1 as indicated for 7 weeks. Plots correspond to each individual mouse. (C) Immunohistochemistry and quantification of pERK, Ki67, Melan-A, CD8, CD69, PD-1 and MHC-I of control (vehicle), anti-PD-1, RMC-7977 and RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 group, n=3/group. H-score was used to access pERK, Ki67 and MHC-I expressions and the percentage of positive cells for melan-A and PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. Scale bar = 200 μm (D) Flow cytometry analysis of the T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of vehicle, anti-PD1, RMC-7977 and the RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 groups. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant. Dotted lines indicate when treatment started, stopped and when rechallenge was carried out.

    Journal: Cancer immunology research

    Article Title: RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibition drives antitumor immunity in preclinical models of NRAS -mutant melanoma

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-25-0744

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-B) The effects of IgG control, anti-PD-1, RMC-7977 or anti-PD-1+RMC-7977 on the growth of OSUMMER.13 tumors. Treatment was initiated when tumors reached around 100mm 3 . The IgG group was treated with IgG control (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=5), the vehicle group was treated with vehicle (P.O., q.d.: n=5), the vehicle + IgG group was treated with IgG control (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=5) and vehicle (P.O., q.d.: n=5), total of n=15M for controls, the anti-PD-1 group was treated with Anti-PD-1 (2µg/µL, I.P., every 5 days: n=7), the RMC-7977 group was treated with RMC-7977 (25 mg/kg, P.O., q.d.: n=7), and the RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 group (n=7) was treated with a combination of RMC-7977 and Anti-PD1 as indicated for 7 weeks. Plots correspond to each individual mouse. (C) Immunohistochemistry and quantification of pERK, Ki67, Melan-A, CD8, CD69, PD-1 and MHC-I of control (vehicle), anti-PD-1, RMC-7977 and RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 group, n=3/group. H-score was used to access pERK, Ki67 and MHC-I expressions and the percentage of positive cells for melan-A and PD1, according to the best fit suggested by the software. Scale bar = 200 μm (D) Flow cytometry analysis of the T cell panel (number of infiltrated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + /CD69 + and CD8 + /CD69 + T cells, and memory CD44 + /CD62L − /CD4 + and CD44 + /CD62L − /CD8 + T cells) of vehicle, anti-PD1, RMC-7977 and the RMC-7977 + anti-PD-1 groups. The graphs are represented as average ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. ns: non-significant. Dotted lines indicate when treatment started, stopped and when rechallenge was carried out.

    Article Snippet: For CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell depletion, specific antibodies (anti-CD4, clone YTS191; cat. #BE0003–1; BioXCell, RRID:AB_1107636 and anti-CD8a, clone YTS169.4, cat. #BE0117, BioXCell, RRID:AB_10950145) were used.

    Techniques: Control, Immunohistochemistry, Software, Flow Cytometry

    A) Daily mice bodyweights measured from 0DPI to 5DPI. B) Lung viral titers expressed as plaque forming units per mL (PFU/mL) measured in lung homogenates at 5DPI. Limit of detection = 40 PFU/mL. C) Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (containing NC99 HA)-binding total IgG measured at 5DPI represented as Area under the curve (AUC) of the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) minus the background noise (OD650). Lung cell subpopulations at 5DPI are presented in panels D to H. D) Percentage of lung total T-cells (CD3+, gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + ). E) Percentage of T-cell subpopulations represented as the mean % of CD3% cells per group: CD4 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - ), CD8 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 - CD8 + ), T regs (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - >FoxP3 + ). CD3 + cells not included in any of the three subpopulations are categorized as “unassigned”. Statistical analysis: for comparisons among groups at several time points: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Color of the significance markers indicates the comparison they represent; for comparisons among groups at a specific time point: Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Significance is represented as:*p = 0.05 to 0.01, **p = 0.01 to 0.001, ***p = 0.001 to 0.0001, ***p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A combination TLR7/8 and RIG-I agonist adjuvant reverts asthmatic allergic sensitization and prevents aggravated influenza infection in OVA-sensitized mice

    doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.659362

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Daily mice bodyweights measured from 0DPI to 5DPI. B) Lung viral titers expressed as plaque forming units per mL (PFU/mL) measured in lung homogenates at 5DPI. Limit of detection = 40 PFU/mL. C) Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (containing NC99 HA)-binding total IgG measured at 5DPI represented as Area under the curve (AUC) of the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) minus the background noise (OD650). Lung cell subpopulations at 5DPI are presented in panels D to H. D) Percentage of lung total T-cells (CD3+, gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + ). E) Percentage of T-cell subpopulations represented as the mean % of CD3% cells per group: CD4 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - ), CD8 + cells (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 - CD8 + ), T regs (Gating: Live> CD45 + > CD3 + >CD4 + CD8 - >FoxP3 + ). CD3 + cells not included in any of the three subpopulations are categorized as “unassigned”. Statistical analysis: for comparisons among groups at several time points: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Color of the significance markers indicates the comparison they represent; for comparisons among groups at a specific time point: Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test using the OVA-Alum (IP) group as control for multiple comparisons. Significance is represented as:*p = 0.05 to 0.01, **p = 0.01 to 0.001, ***p = 0.001 to 0.0001, ***p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: For the depletion of the different T-cell subpopulations, mice were injected intraperitoneally with either CD4 depleting antibody BioXCell #BP0003-1 (clone YTS 177) with a dosing of 500 μg in 100 μL PBS, CD8 depleting antibody BioXCell #BE0223 (clone 53-5.8) with a dosing 250 μg in 100μL PBS or a combination of both, 72 and 24 hr prior to the first OVA challenge.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Control, Comparison